Videos

While in Green Bay, Wisconsin for a conference, Dr. Bowen was interviewed by WFRV-TV for a program entitled “Inquiry.” Watch and listen to Dr. Bowen, named a “maverik” by interviewer Tom Joles, explain the differences between individual and systems thinking, with forays into the “ideal parents,” individuality and togetherness, and the Green Bay Packers.

During the mid-1960’s, Dr. Bowen discovered that conflicts in nuclear families became much milder for those who worked to define a self within his or her family of origin, thus “bypassing the nuclear family.” In this video, Dr. Bowen explains how his focus on the family of origin is “the whole basis of the therapy at the family center…”

“Among all the concepts that I’ve developed, probably the most important had to do with the extended family. And another one (that I consider the most important) would be the differentiation of self” (M. Bowen, M.D.). Dr. Bowen answers audience questions, beginning with a request to explain differentiation in one sentence.

Two clips are included in Part 2. In the first, Dr. Bowen considers the quality of the relationship of the therapist and family. In the second, he discusses the nature of cutoff.

In responding to audience questions, Dr. Bowen talks about open relationships and the importance of AA in providing relief of symptoms and how it has fixed more drinking problems than anything else. It takes something else, however, to make real changes in life.

The account of a man who was separated from his wife for 12 years but unable to make a decision to file for divorce leads into a discussion of the impossible situation of more than one therapist at a time working with a family. You “cannot take up two courses of action at the same time,” said Dr. Bowen.

The working hypothesis Dr. Bowen developed to be tested in his research at NIMH purports that all people, to some degree, do not separate self from parents. The degree to which this separation is accomplished or not is reflected in the wholeness of the person. “No one is a complete person alone. The past is hanging on to you.” This segment is rich.

Dr. Bowen outlines differences between natural systems theory and “man-made” systems theories — in particular general systems theory. “Generally, we mix up the two — what came from nature and what came from man’s head.” The challenges of instant communication are next. It has brought the population closer together. The problem is that the closer we get together, the more allergic we get to each other.

In these two clips, Dr. Bowen talks about neutrality in therapy, relating to people without feeling sorry for them, helping friends and colleagues, and the danger of caring.

This newest clip is the first in a series selected from tapes of the “Addictions and Family Systems” conference held in Green Bay, WI, in 1990. In April 1990, six months before his death, Dr. Bowen begins the conference by describing his Odyssey in developing a science of human behavior that would one day replace Freudian Theory. 

This clip is the second in a series selected from tapes of the “Addictions and Family Systems” conference held in Green Bay, WI, in 1990. In April 1990, six months before his death, Dr. Bowen begins the conference by describing his Odyssey in developing a science of human behavior that would one day replace Freudian Theory. 

This clip is the third in a series selected from tapes of the “Addictions and Family Systems” conference held in Green Bay, WI, in 1990. In April 1990, six months before his death, Dr. Bowen begins the conference by describing his Odyssey in developing a science of human behavior that would one day replace Freudian Theory. 

This clip is the fourth in a series selected from tapes of the “Addictions and Family Systems” conference held in Green Bay, WI, in 1990. In April 1990, six months before his death, Dr. Bowen begins the conference by describing his Odyssey in developing a science of human behavior that would one day replace Freudian Theory. 

This clip is the fifth in a series selected from tapes of the “Addictions and Family Systems” conference held in Green Bay, WI, in 1990. In April 1990, six months before his death, Dr. Bowen begins the conference by describing his Odyssey in developing a science of human behavior that would one day replace Freudian Theory. 

This clip is the sixth in a series selected from tapes of the “Addictions and Family Systems” conference held in Green Bay, WI, in 1990. In April 1990, six months before his death, Dr. Bowen begins the conference by describing his Odyssey in developing a science of human behavior that would one day replace Freudian Theory. 

This clip is the seventh in a series selected from tapes of the “Addictions and Family Systems” conference held in Green Bay, WI, in 1990. In April 1990, six months before his death, Dr. Bowen begins the conference by describing his Odyssey in developing a science of human behavior that would one day replace Freudian Theory. 

This clip is the eighth in a series selected from tapes of the “Addictions and Family Systems” conference held in Green Bay, WI, in 1990. In April 1990, six months before his death, Dr. Bowen begins the conference by describing his Odyssey in developing a science of human behavior that would one day replace Freudian Theory. 

This clip is the ninth in a series selected from tapes of the “Addictions and Family Systems” conference held in Green Bay, WI, in 1990. In April 1990, six months before his death, Dr. Bowen begins the conference by describing his Odyssey in developing a science of human behavior that would one day replace Freudian Theory. 

This clip is part one of four clips featuring Dr. Bowen talking to the Special Postgraduate Program at the Bowen Center in the 1980s. Listen as Dr. Bowen discusses triangles and predictable ways to de-triangle a situation. He also offers some sage advice for those who have “screwed up” their marriage.

This video clip features Dr. Bowen telling his infamous “Skunk woman” story about a patient declared to be “unanalyzable” by several psychoanalysts at the Menninger Clinic. Dr. Bowen challenges anyone with an interest in science to find out what makes a skunk stink. With Dr. Bowen’s supervision willing clinician achieved a perfect result with the skunk woman. Having the staying power to out skunk the skunk applies to your family and your spouse as Dr. Bowen explains.

This clip features Murray Bowen discussing the advantages of taking a more neutral position and how this impacts thinking. He also looks at his journey from Freud to a science of human behavior concluding systems was the only way to get there.

This clip, entitled “How to Approach the Family,” looks at how individual versus family approach differs. Dr. Bowen describes symptoms as they move around the family as a “shell game” and challenges the audience to view the family without any polarity. His focus is to work with the leader in the family to achieve therapeutic excellence.

Dr. Bowen addresses the importance of relationships to mankind calling them basic to the human condition. There is always a relationship to somebody even in survival level families he asserts.

Dr. Bowen discusses how schizophrenia is a model for all of us not separate from us. He details how to set up a relationship in therapy so the therapist promises only what they can do and does not become a liar.

In this discussion with the Special Post-Graduate Program about transference, Murray Bowen states, “Everything in one relationship is in another. It is just a matter of intensity.”

In this video clip Dr. Bowen talks to the Special Postgraduate Program about how to work with families whose, “decks are awash.” He describes finding the most mature person in the group and working with that them to define what they can do, will do and won’t do.

Dr. Bowen talks about how his inability to resolve intense relationships with psychotic level people led him to think in terms of family. Instead of the person developing an intense relationship with Dr. Bowen and staying stuck he shifted his focus so that the intense relationship stayed within the family not with him. That is where it could then be resolved.

Dr. Bowen discusses how to move relationships back up between two other important people in the family. That is de-triangling in action. You can’t get rid of this level of intensity with one other person. De-triangling is how you get out of “smelly situations.”

In this video clip entitled “Dealing with Polarities and Passions,” Dr. Bowen addresses the importance of staying in the middle and seeing both sides.

Dr. Bowen opens this short two minute clip by saying, “There is no way to stop wars.” He goes on to discuss what he thinks the role of a low key human being could be in shaping wars by staying out of the righteousness of wars.

A question from the audience spurred Dr. Bowen to discuss global issues including democracy suggesting there is an endpoint to democracy and the U.S. is pushing toward that end point.

Dr. Bowen talks about seeing the family as a unit without polarities and putting effort on the healthy side of the organism. He also addresses common errors including trying to sell the family on what you have discovered and the pitfalls of student evaluations.

Bowen challenges students to be clear about what terms are scientific. Echoing the challenges facing us today he asks, “How much are you influenced by the looseness in society?”

Listen as Dr. Bowen talks about Freud’s attempts to deal with feelings and where Freud fell short. Bowen also discusses the scientific method which he sees as a way to deal with feeling data.

Listen as Dr. Bowen teases apart the work of transference and countertransference in the clinical setting. “What do you put into the package of knowing who you are?”

In this clip the relevance of Dr. Bowen’s thinking shows as he talks about the totality of societal regression getting worse and worse. He refers to differentiation of self and how it gets into Societal Regression.

In this video Dr. Bowen offers a real life example of how tension at the top of an organization can filter down and affect those at the lowest levels.

In Part 1 of this talk to the Special Post Graduate Program, Dr. Bowen challenges the group to get beyond their own heads and their own subjectivity in order to give direction to therapy with a client. “What are the hazards of doing therapy that feels right?”, he asks. “What do you do if your therapy is a bust?”

In Part 2 of this talk to the Special Post Graduate Program, Dr. Bowen points out that if you get too focused on differentiating a self, that in itself is a sinkhole. He goes on to outline the difference between inductive and deductive thinking, pointing out that we are all automatically deductive thinkers and have to work at inductive thinking. He challenges the group, “What in the hell are you going to do to get out of deduction?” His final question is for himself as a teacher. “How does someone in my position loosen up your way of thinking?”

In Part 3 of this talk to the Special Post Graduate Program, Dr. Bowen talks about differentiating a self in the face of the desires of others, citing an example from a tenure committee at Georgetown. He asks, “How do you go about being you when everyone around you is trying to dictate what you should be?”

In Part 4 of this talk to the Special Post Graduate Program, Dr. Bowen addresses the forces that work against you when trying to differentiate. He suggests that there is a force within all of us that would have us avoid this effort, and that hopefully, one can get to the point of working on it every day. Dr. Bowen notes, “We don’t change our spots too often.”

In Part 1 of this talk to the Special Postgraduate Program, Dr. Bowen challenges the viewer with the question, “Are you interested in knowing what you are?” He explores “what it takes” to understand oneself. “How do you do it?” He directs one to examine how they are thinking, rather than what they think, if they wish to get closer to understanding themselves. When things don’t work out for you the way the theory would predict, is that a problem with the system or with what you did?

What does having a good relationship with your mother make you but a leech? How does one truly pull oneself up while not leeching self from others? If you can manage to be in contact with a broader network of people, with more people in your extended family, you won’t leech self from them, and they won’t leech from you. If one wishes to not be a leech, they must not just stay in contact with their families but have real, honest communication with them as well.

How do you make contact with even the lowest functioning person, especially if they aren’t very verbal? Dr. Bowen points out that “they’re dying to tell you about it if you can ask the right questions.” Something accounts for people not being very verbal, and if you can break through that outside shell, then you can have a relationship with them. He notes, “If you can cause people to want to talk to you, you’re priceless to those other people because they probably are having problems contacting others.” That ability to communicate is the basis of a good relationship.

The pattern of blaming the functioning of self on others is pandemic. Blaming others can increase as a relationship grows closer. The level of differentiation can go down, and then each blames the other for self’s functioning. Dr. Bowen explains that this is the same problem in schizophrenia, when parents cannot get along with each other and put the problem on to the child. He frames schizophrenia as being primarily a psychological problem, noting that while there are genetic and physical-constitutional factors, that the psychological one is paramount. If the psychological process is removed, people can deal very well with the other factors.

In this video, Dr. Bowen describes his methodology when first developing and testing his theory. At the beginning, he developed the device “theory comes first” as a guiding principle. The effort of working on theory first was to draw things out in detail so that one can anticipate and make sense of what comes up in practice. Once the theory had been developed, the effort around testing its validity required observing if any problems that came up were in the people using the theory or in the theory itself—with the latter requiring substantially more time to fix. The theory eventually became his impersonal rule book, but at the beginning, there were a lot of problems with the rule book. From June 7-8, 1988.

As long as your governing principle is an impersonal rule book, it does not change based on your feelings. The therapist needs to be dependent on their knowledge rather than their feelings. By overly relying on feelings rather than facts, Dr. Bowen warns, “When the world gets aggressive and nasty, you get nasty back. You counter a feeling with a counter-feeling.” From June 7-8, 1988.

Dr. Bowen notes that science has barely begun to discover everything there is to know, but that the process of discovery starts right in front of one’s own eyes, by observing the world around you. The elements of Bowen theory are observable in the world, but he notes that people often can’t see the future that is right in front of their eyes. However, if one can aim to “erase” their own head, to have a flexible mindset, it allows one to adopt new theories and to advance science. Feelings make it difficult to “erase” one’s own head, but with that goal in mind, it makes it possible to hear new ideas. From June 7-8, 1988.